|
|
||
|
SIA ISSUE BACKGROUNDERS FIRE AND BUILDING SAFETY (FABS)
In this effort the FABS Committee has adopted the following goals to ensure that new Building and Fire Codes:
Importance: The need for such a committee stems from the peculiar needs of semiconductor manufacture. Historically, building and fire codes did not accurately capture the physical requirements of cleanrooms or the need to use a wide variety of chemicals. Some codes, as formulated, would have precluded semiconductor facilities, processes, and chemicals if they were not restructured to allow for these operations. In some parts of the country, in particular California, local authorities were promulgating very restrictive hazardous materials ordinances which would have severely restricted or prohibited semiconductor manufacturing operations in cleanroom facilities as they existed. SIA Position/Action: Originally, the FABS effort was divided regionally: a group in the West dealt primarily with the Unified Building and Unified Fire Codes; a group in the East dealt with BOCA and NFPA; and a group in the South dealt with the Southern Codes. In each venue, SIA contracted with code experts who represented our interests at code setting meetings. FABS members have also represented SIA and their respective companies in developing local ordinances. In recent years there has been a consolidation of code writing authorities from the numerous entities in existence to two major factions, International Codes and NFPA. To address this new situation, the FABS Committee was reorganized into one U.S. based effort and consultants for the International code process and the NFPA process were retained. While most states appear to be following the International Code Council, the newly reformed group is following the development of both sets of codes to insure that semiconductor manufacturing requirements are adequately represented in these new codes. Key code change successes in the current timeframe include the following:
This activity has implications
for both domestic and international manufacture of semiconductors. A manufacturer,
or a company that utilizes overseas manufacturers, should understand whether
or not the manufacturing facilities used offer protections comparable
to those in the US. There have been notable instances when foreign cleanrooms
have had to be shut down or destroyed because of conditions that our codes
would not allow, especially with respect to chemical storage and materials
of construction. Loss of a facility could greatly impact a foundry user's
ability to meet its customer demand. Participation on the FABS committee
could greatly enhance the ability to recognize potential problems and
to make better selections of manufacturing facilities. |